Crowning Achievement

Canada’s new crown:

Canada was founded on Judeo-Christian values, considered not relevant anymore.

Canada Unveils New Heraldic Crown Emblem Stripped of Religious Symbols

The Royal crown is unveiled by Samy Khalid (L), Chief Herald of Canada at the Canadian Heraldic Authority and Donald Booth, Canadian Secretary to the King, during coronation celebrations in honour of King Charles III in Ottawa on May 6, 2023. (The Canadian Press/Spencer Colby)

Reflects our new reality.

Cross at the top is replaced by a snowflake – Canada’s new reality. After all Canada’s Snowflake in Chief is the Governor General with her jester of a snowflake Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau.

Don’t we get a say?

I guess not. I have always believed that our electoral system equates to an elected dictatorship. The PM, once elected, can do whatever he or she pleases for 4 years.

Next on the chopping block? Our coat of arms.

Arms of Canada - Wikipedia

With our coat of arms you can be damn sure that the Union Jack will disappear but not the Fleur de Lis and that the crown will be replaced with a snowflake. The rainbow flag will replace the Union Jack. The lion on the left will be replaced with a beaver and the unicorn will stay.

Our crowning achievement? Hosers with stubbies

Bob and Doug McKenzie take on a worthy cause, eh - The Globe and Mail


Poo poo our veteran legacy:

Official Art - Vimy Ridge | Canada and the First World War

I wonder how many of the Canadian Gen Zeders know or even care about the sacrifices made at Vimy Ridge – or even what war it was born out of?

And of our government’s push for a Central Bank Digital Currency equates to more control. Watch this:

Of course in the knowledge free zone of the Gen Z and Millennials, young Canadians will sign up for this enmasse.

Freelunch is disgustingly arrogant.


Our other national anthem.

Written by Alexander Muir in 1867, the year of Canada’s birth as a nation. He wrote it after his stint in the Queen’s Own Rifles (Victoria) after the Battle of Ridgeway against the Fenians.

The trashing of our traditions and national symbols by the Liberal government is what happens when uncontrolled immigration and divershity occurs. A nation loses its identity because new arrivals do not have the same shared values or experiences that their host nation celebrates, nor are they encouraged to do so. In time the national traditions, on which Canada is born, are whittled down or disappear altogether. That is what is happening in Trudeau’s vision of Canada as the worlds first post national state.

Canada is, in reality, Ontario (Upper Canada) and Quebec (Lower Canada), Nova Scotia and New Brunswick (1867). The rest be damned.

https://languagefairness.ca/docs/presidents_message/2016/justin-says-canada-has-no-core-identity.php

Darn. I want a new country and a new Prime Minister. As long as the Liberal Family Compact continues there is no hope for the rest of us, especially out here in western Canada.


Kurofune and other books I have written. Good reads with great reviews.

www.johnmorrisonauthor.com

Check them out at: www.johnmorrisonauthor.com

Maple Leaf Forever

Canada’s electoral process of first past the post is inherently flawed. What we have here, in real terms, is an elected dictatorship. The current proroguing of Canada’s parliament by Justin Trudeau and the end of various committees that could have potentially harmed the PM’s credibility and political future is a case in point. Every four years we go to the polls nationally and one individual is elected Prime Minister. The party that he or she represents becomes the party in power. That individual then has up to four years to govern as he or she so wishes. There is no oversight. It becomes an exercise of arrogance and scandal. He, she and they can do whatever they feel is right for the country based upon their own ideology, and not necessarily the will of the people they represent. The opposition has no choice but to nod their little heads and follow suit.

Question period, which is supposed to keep the government honest and in check, is a façade and a democratic joke. If the ruling party does not like what they hear or the debate on policy decisions they can shut question period down and go for the vote, and always along party lines. If the PM is fearful that his will is being undermined and his survival is at stake he can prorogue parliament (shut it down) until such time as he feels his patina is somewhat less tarnished. That is what is going on right now as I write this.

Some would say, yes, but that is why we have regional representation in the Senate. To protect us all from an elected dictatorship of the commons. Yes that was the original intent of the founding fathers but the original provinces, primarily Quebec, have stated that they will never agree to another province, or group of provinces with regional biases such as that found in the west, to supersede their authority or power within the Confederation. Same goes for Ontario. Added to that, Senators are appointed by the sitting PM, usually along party lines, so the chamber of sober second thought is in reality a drunken mirror image of the sitting government. It is a political joke and a partisan club of old fools.

The final nail in the cabinet hierarchy is the dictatorial rule of the party leader, or PM, who chastises and refuses to allow his own government Members of Parliament (MPs) and Senators to vote with their conscious or constituent wishes with the threat of caucus exile if they decide to do so.

What can be done here? This is my  suggestion and it is based somewhat on  population and representation.

Right now Canada has 338 seats – primarily based on a population of 35M people, the majority of which reside in Ontario (14M) and Quebec (8M). If the west was considered regional, i.e., Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia, their total population would come in under 11.4M people. The north consisting of Yukon, Nunavut and NW come in at about 100,000 people. They could be lumped in with the west for a western regional total of about 11.5 M people, about 3M more than Quebec. The Maritimes – Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland – come in at about 2M people. They could be lumped in with Quebec as an eastern regional block for a total of about 10M people, close to the west but not quite. Ontario would remain a central regional block in and of itself with 14M people. Three regional voting blocks in Canada but with all having nearly similar population numbers.

Thus Ontario has 40% of the population of Canada; the west and eastern blocks 30% each. Translate that into seats and one comes up with Ontario:135 seats; the west and eastern blocks 101 seats each for a total of 337 seats. Close enough.

At election time each province would vote accordingly but separately from their respective blocks. A tally would then be taken. For example, lets say the Green party took 8% of the vote in BC, 3% in Alberta, 2% in Saskatchewan and 4% in Manitoba. They would have 17% of the western block of votes. The same rules would apply to the Liberals, Conservatives. NDP and others for a percentage total of 100% of the western voting block of 101 seats. In this example, the Greens would take 17% of the western seats for a total of 17 seats, representing the West in Ottawa. The same rules would apply to the central and eastern voting blocks. Conceivably the Green Party could receive, using their western 17% gain as an example, 22 seats in Ontario and another 17 seats from the eastern block for a total of 56 seats in Ottawa. Under the current electoral rules the Green Party would have one maybe two seats in total as their percentages are too low to win a majority in the various provincial electoral districts under our current system.

Ridings at the federal level would disappear. Seats in parliament would be allocated to the western provinces and northern territories. Same for the east and central regions. These seats could be broken down further to represent various districts within the regional voting blocks. The end result would in all probability be a coalition government as no one party would ever receive the majority of the votes within each of the regional blocks to form a majority, but no one region of the country could push their policy or ideology or agenda over the other. The parties and regions would have to work together to make things work. The country would be split into three regions, all with some form of regional autonomy to represent their respective interests while in Ottawa. Right now there are probably six vested interest regions in this country, two of which have almost complete control of the Canada’s political outcome – Ontario and Quebec. It is too “centrally centric.” Ontario and Quebec have too much political power. Something has to change.

I feel it is time to rid ourselves of the undemocratic first past the post electoral process. I am probably naïve here as this would require a change to the constitution of this country. Something that in all probability will never happen. But the consequences of our current system are dire: regional separation particularly the western provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba. If this were to occur, Quebec would be next to separate and go it alone leaving Ontario, British Columbia and the maritime provinces isolated. The Confederation would be dead.

Just my thoughts for a Friday morning. It is raining out here in Mill Bay, BC

“The Maple Leaf Forever” is a Canadian song written by Alexander Muir (1830–1906) in 1867, the year of Canada’s Confederation. He wrote the work after serving with the Queen’s Own Rifles of Toronto in the Battle of Ridgeway against the Fenians in 1866.
To me this should be our national anthem.
And bring God back into the fold of our country, with Judeo / Christian values. If we don’t the fabric of this country will be torn apart.We have already started on a slippery slope.
SJ………………..Out